Stone's Thought of the Week

[Kidman]

If you won a match with sexual stakes would you prefer oral, forced intercourse with your opponent--maybe while in restraints--or forced anal to add to his/her humiliation?

My theory as a guy would be if you got head the (presumably & preferably) female opponent would give you the most amazing blowjob in hopes of getting it over as quick as possible. But I think if you chose vaginal intercourse she would lie there limp and even if her legs were restrained, spread to give better access or even locked into like a doggystyle, she would try her hardest to not enjoy it and I'm my opinion it wouldn't be enjoyable. Now forced anal I can see as just an act of sadism to torture your opponent, going as hard and rough as possible to make him or her scream, to add to the humiliation.
Wanted a general opinion for a story I'm writing, you can see by my clearly scientific research which way I'm leaning but wanted to hear some general thoughts.

Thanks,

Stone

[Cerebus42]

I would vote for giving anal intercourse to a female opponent on a few reasons. I don't get to do that with my current partner so the novelty of it is there and it wouldn't have to be extra hard or forceful in that it is naturally morally degrading and since you have already dominated her physically in the match this completes the win.

[Kidman]

I can dig that, just like slowly assfuck her; almost as if you're taking your time. Naturally she'l be uncomfortable and there's no need to just tear it up--though depending on how she fought you may take the chance to get some payback--but just the act of being entered from behind would be humiliating enough, though if you choose that angle you may make a long time enemy out a single loss whose goal it will be to pay you back.

Stone